Issues : Errors of FC
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
FC is missing the 3rd beat in the L.H., which was supplemented in GE by adding a crotchet rest. It is also FE (→EE) that contain a rest, hence there are no doubts that it was a crotchet rest that the copyist overlooked. Cf. a similar oversight by Fontana in the Mazurka in D category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The clear fleck at the pitch of b in the chord on the 2nd crotchet of the bar is probably simply an ink blot. This note is absent in all the remaining sources; it is also absent in all the sources in the remaining three analogous places (bars 19, 51 and 59). category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 39-47
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
There is no accidental to the last grace note in bars 39 and 47 in FC, while in FE in bars 39, 45 and 47. The patent oversights, the ones in bars 39 and 47 most probably by Chopin himself, who considered the earlier category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In the main text we include the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark , Errors of FC |
no. 3, 
to g
1 to be sufficient, were corrected in 
in 
] suggested by the editors